Skip to content

Conversation

felixfontein
Copy link
Collaborator

@felixfontein felixfontein commented Aug 2, 2025

SUMMARY
ISSUE TYPE
  • Feature Pull Request
COMPONENT NAME

storagebox* modules

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 2, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.92%. Comparing base (788ce67) to head (7585d2a).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #173      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.93%   99.92%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          61       61              
  Lines        4722     4103     -619     
  Branches      519      431      -88     
==========================================
- Hits         4719     4100     -619     
  Misses          2        2              
  Partials        1        1              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@felixfontein
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The last TODO item is blocked by ansible/ansible#85614; I might just move it to a follow-up PR and first get the others merged (and released).

@felixfontein felixfontein marked this pull request as ready for review August 3, 2025 07:40
@felixfontein
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hmm, according to https://robot.hetzner.com/doc/webservice/en.html#get-storagebox the old API is still there for some specific storage boxes. So let's wait with merging this until the API has been fully removed.

@felixfontein
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jooola @apricote do you know for how much longer the old API will still be around for BX10 storage boxes?

@felixfontein felixfontein changed the title Storagebox cleanup Remove old storagebox code (using hetzner_user) Oct 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant